Renowned Ghanaian musician Michael Owusu Addo, professionally known as Sarkodie, and his legal representatives have categorically denied reports suggesting the withdrawal of ongoing lawsuit proceedings against Ecobank Ghana Limited.
In an official statement, Sarkodie’s legal team, the Robeth Smith Law Group, dismissed the claims as “baseless, malicious, and a deliberate attack on their client’s integrity.”
They further cautioned media outlets against disseminating unverified information, warning that such “prejudicial publications” could result in legal consequences.
Background of the Case
Op-Ed: Pulse Sports Ghana’s Mandela Anuvabe has a simple question for the Sports and Recreation Minister Kofi Iddie Adams…
Asante Kotoko are looking to hire an expatriate coach to lead them next season after the dismissal of Dr Prosper Narteh Ogum this season. Here’s the reason…
The legal dispute stems from allegations that Ecobank Ghana featured an individual bearing a striking resemblance to Sarkodie in an advertising campaign—without the artist’s prior consent.
The rapper contends that this unauthorised use of his likeness constitutes a violation of his intellectual property rights and has caused both reputational harm and financial losses.
Reliefs sought by Sarkodie
In the lawsuit, Sarkodie is seeking:
The controversial campaign, titled #ItsGivingScam, featured a Sarkodie lookalike reportedly affiliated with First Bank Ghana.
The decision to use the doppelgänger sparked widespread backlash on social media, with critics questioning Ecobank’s judgement.
Many suggested that the bank could have instead featured King Promise, an artist already under its brand ambassadorship.
False claims of withdrawal
Recent media reports alleged that Sarkodie had instructed his legal team to discontinue the lawsuit, while Ecobank remained intent on pursuing the case. However, the Robeth Smith Law Group has vehemently refuted these claims, reiterating their commitment to securing justice for their client.
Final warning to media
Sarkodie’s legal team has issued a stern advisory to media houses and online platforms, urging them to verify information before publication.
They emphasised that any further false or defamatory reports would be met with appropriate legal action.
The case remains active, with both parties expected to proceed in accordance with legal protocols.
